Sunday, October 24, 2010

Are Business Interests Giving Bad Advice to the Canadian Government on Climate Change?

by Larry Powell
If you enjoy this blog, please consider 
donating to the author to keep it going. 
Just click on the link below.
Thanks! - Larry
                                                                                                      

In 1988, the Government of Canada, under Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, created The National 

Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE). 

  In laymen's terms, its duty was, and is, to advise Ottawa on ways of developing this country economically that won't destroy our environment or the hopes of future generations.

Just this month, NRTEE published (at least on first glance) a largely credible report on global warming , entitled "Degrees of Change" in the magazine, Canadian Geographic. It describes it as "The first comprehensive illustration of expected climate impacts published for Canada."

It lists several consequences, "some positive, most negative" which are expected across the country this century, "as climate change brings increasing temperatures and changing moisture levels."

Well, so far, so good. Many of the impacts documented in the report have been foreseen by most climate scientists for some time.

Most reasonable people might also find understandable, I think, the report's prediction that certain recreational pursuits, such as golf, might even benefit from a warming world.

But then, incredibly, the NRTEE adds, and these words lifted off the page for me, another example of a "positive" impact;

"[There will be] greater access to northern oil, gas and mineral resources."

"….greater access to oil, gas and mineral resources…..??"

Now just a moment! Could it be that this distinguished agency, presumably schooled in the climate sciences, is not aware that oil and gas resources are creating the climate crisis we are all facing now?

The International Panel on Climate Change, long recognized as the ultimate authority on the topic, and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, said the following in its Fourth Assessment Report in 2007:

"The increases in global atmospheric CO2 since the industrial revolution are mainly due to CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels, gas flaring and cement production."

Carbon dioxide, of course, is the main greenhouse gas fuelling global warming.

For years now, it has been widely accepted by climate scientists everywhere that man-made emissions from the burning of oil and gas resources have been a leading contributor to our current crisis.

While there is no doubt NRTEE has to deal with "competing interests" in its deliberations, this does nothing less than fly in the face of modern, accepted and conventional wisdom and cannot be allowed to stand!

It is simply wrong-headed and stupid; Surely this is just another "out" Prime Minister Harper will latch onto and use as an excuse to continue in his dishonourable role as climate-denier to the world.

So just who are the people who make up NRTEE?

Several have strong business connections and political ties to the federal government. Could it be that their "pro-business" desire to make money is trumping their will to curb the disastrous consequences of global warming?

Before turning to academia (he now teaches at the University of Calgary), NRTEE's Chair, Robert Page, worked for the Calgary-based TransAlta Corporation. It describes itself as the largest, publicly-traded generator and marketer of electricity and renewable energy," in the country, with revenues into the billions.

According to the corporation's website, TransAlta places heavy emphasis on the development of alternative, renewable energy sources. While it already operates plants which run on gas and coal, it also runs several others on wind and hydro.

But if that Corporation is as committed to renewable energy as it claims, Mr. Page does not seem to have carried that commitment with him now that he heads the Round Table!

There is no mention in Degrees of Change of the importance of replacing conventional energy with alternative or sustainable sources, for example! None!

What his group does do is paint an unfortunate picture of fossil fuel resources, laid bare by melting ice, snow and permafrost, all driven by global warming, as an "opportunity" to perpetuate that very same dangerous cycle of global warming, indefinitely, into the future.

Reading between the lines, NRTEE members certainly seem more determined that we all "get use to" climate change than attack its root-causes.

According to NRTEE President and CEO David McLaughlin, “Adapt and prosper will be increasingly central to Canadian governments, communities, and businesses as these effects become more and more evident.”

So, sadly, a report that might have been a useful public policy tool to eventually help adapt, lessen and even solve our catastrophic climate crisis, has been reduced to a weapon which Captains of Industry can now wave around to justify business as usual.
====
COMMENTS:
mrspleats 
Isn't this always the case special interests we may say. Remember most politicians are not smart and do not know what 's going on so yes they are quick to believe anything from the source that polls the best or sounds the most convincing. Facts have no place.

Rated up

Keep on being a thinker!
 ========
Larry,

Thanks so much for alerting me to this and for your critical analysis. Far too little such analysis exists of the many problematic institutions like NRTEE. Sustainable development, Brian Mulroney's 'environmental' legacy, like the popular nebulous notion of sustainability itself are code words for what lies behind---continued economic (material) growth.

Vere Scott.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

What a Scientist Didn't Tell the New York Times About His Study on Bee Deaths

By Katherine Eban, Fortune - October 8'10
EDITOR'S NOTE: Please read this article carefully. It's yet another sordid tale of corporate dirty deeds and media sloppiness..scandalous in the extreme. Shame on you Bayer CropScience! Shame on you, New York Times! l.p. 




COMMENT:"A chemical company-Bayer-funds the research, and 'surprise'..the conclusion is:  bees are not dying off because of chemicals. Isn't that nice!" Margaret

Manitoba Funds Buy-Local Campaign

Manitoba Co-Operator - Staff - 10/19/2010 

Work on a "Buy Manitoba" branding campaign...

Friday, October 22, 2010

Have We Really Solved the Mystery Behind the Shocking Die-off of Bees?

Grist.org / By Tom Laskawy
The New York Times essentially called it 'case closed' on Colony Collapse Disorder, but there is good reason to be wary about their reporting.
 photo by l.p.
 EDITOR'S COMMENT: My sentiments exactly!  The degree to which media, even of the stature of the New York Times, seem prepared to bend over backwards to avoid singling out the role of pesticides, is truly disturbing. Even the group representing Canadian beekeepers seems engaged in the same game. The Bayers and Monsantos of this world truly do have powerful allies!  l.p.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Federal Government Failing to Enforce Laws in Oilsands

Simon Dyer — Pembina Institute - Oct. 20, 2010
You could be forgiven...


A thick layer of tar & a thin film of oil/bitumen
reflecting a late summer sunset on the Albian Sands Muskeg River Mine tar pond. Photo by beautifuldestruction.ca

Monday, October 18, 2010

Climate Change Hits Home (Video)

Latest Bee Loss Figures Show Canada Doing Better

by Larry Powell  

 The group representing beekeepers in this country says 21 percent of honey bee colonies in Canada were lost over the winter of 2009-10.

The Canadian Association of Professional Apiculturists (CAPA) says, of the 611,972 "over-wintered" colonies, 128,463 were dead or unproductive by spring. 

According to these latest CAPA figures, belatedly released just this past Friday, this represents 1.4x the long-term winter loss rate for Canada. 


The Association describes this as a substantial improvement over the previous three-year period during which losses averaged 32.6%.

CAPA credits beekeepers' effective use of mite control products in the improvement in colony losses. It adds, "extension professionals" also attribute such improvement to a new mite-control product called "Apivar," approved for use last fall.


CAPA tempers its optomitic message with this note of caution, however.

"Though encouraging, it is too early to determine whether this decline in mortality constitutes a sustained improvement in colony health."

 
Among the provinces, Nova Scotia recorded the highest losses, at 41.9%, while nearby Prince Edward Island had the lowest,  just 16.7%.


(My own province, Manitoba, lost 25.6% and the neighbouring province, Saskatchewan, 20.5%.)


One region of the country, Vancouver Island, however, recorded disastrous losses, way worse than the rest of the country. There, beekeepers lost up to 76% of their colonies! Some were wiped out, altogether!


CAPA notes that most beekeepers there used an anti-mite control which the mites may have developed resistance to.

North Dakota Cow Crap Will Harm Lake Winnipeg

CCPA Photo credit: Pangalau Massive dairy concentrated animal feeding operations  (CAFOs) being permitted and proposed in  North Dakota  are...