BY  Jim Harding
          THE  SASKATCHEWAN CONNECTION  Published in R-Town News on April 1,  2011
(Please also read - "Uranium City - a Legacy of Cancer.")
The  Fukushima’s nuclear reactors which are steadily contaminating Japan’s  atmosphere, seashore, watersheds, food chains and making millions of Japanese  into nuclear refugees are owned and operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co. or  Tepco.  Tepco  has Saskatchewan connections. The Globe and Mail describes Tepco as “one  of (Cameco’s) largest customers for uranium used to fuel nuclear power plants”,  and there is little doubt that much of the radioactive contamination threatening  Japan comes from uranium fuel mined in northern Saskatchewan. And Tepco is  directly involved in this mining; since the 1990s it has been Cameco’s partner  in the massive Cigar Lake mine, which has itself had serious “accidents” and is  years behind its production schedule due to recurring underground flooding.  
Cameco has  taken a big hit since the nuclear disaster started at Tepco’s plants; its share  value has dropped 20% and the demand for uranium could markedly fall as more  countries become wary of nuclear power. Still, Cameco’s CEO Jerry Grandey isn’t  sounding bitter, though he admitted to the Globe and Mail that Japan is “not living  up to our standards of transparency”. Grandey himself may not want “the truth,  the whole truth and nothing but the truth” to come out; he flippantly states  that “in the long term all of this will demonstrate the strength of the  industry”, a cavalier attitude in the face of such devastation. 
SKETCHY FACE-SAVING
   While there  have been periods of media blackout about the Fukushima reactors and the  industry continues to try to normalize the disaster, things continue to spin  more out of control since the disaster started three weeks ago. The New York  Times is now reporting the disaster as “the worst atomic crisis in 25 years”,  second only to Chernobyl in 1986, but information coming out of Japan remains  sketchy. The 19 million people residing in Tokyo are told not to worry, even  though the Fukushima reactors at risk of melt-down are only 150 miles away, the  distance from Regina’s Legislative Buildings to Premier Brad Walls’ Swift  Current riding. Meanwhile radioactive particles from Japan are being “found as  far away as Iceland” and over Newfoundland. And though Tokyo residents are being  told to “sit tight”, at one point mothers were told to not give their infants  tap water. There was an immediate run on bottled water which some are also using  for cooking.
The nuclear  disaster was initially correctly reported as a global nuclear disaster. Then its  profile receded, and enforcing the “no fly zone” over Libya gained the camera’s  attention. But every day or two something more slips out. Tepco and government  authorities try in vain to normalize the disaster, as though things are coming  under control, but this has more to do with Japanese face-saving than scientific  honesty. In a recent CBC radio interview the Japanese ambassador to Canada  refused to respond to any questions about radioactivity and risk. When it was  pointed out that the evacuation zone for Japanese was only 25 KM whereas the US  had already pulled its nationals back 80 KM from Fukushima, he simply responded  that America is a democracy and has a right to do as it decides.
Tepco  officials are clearly scrambling to avert a full melt down. Ten days after the  first hydrogen explosions that destroyed the containment buildings the company  still hadn’t hooked electricity back up to their six reactors. (Meanwhile it was  reported that an offshore wind farm survived the earthquake and continued to  produce electricity after the tsunami.) With no power to pump water to cool the  core (or the overheating spent fuel bundles stored outside four reactors), Tepco  officials have regularly vented radioactive gases into the air to avert a core  explosion and possible meltdown. Tepco brought in helicopters which desperately  dropped sea water onto the reactors, often missing the targets altogether. Then  fire trucks were brought in to spray seawater onto the reactors, in what seemed  another futile though symbolically heroic gesture. 
CONTAMINATION SPREADING
   And then, not  surprisingly, the other shoe fell and it was reported that milk had 27 times the  acceptable radioactivity and that vegetables had 17 times the allowable. And  then, as if it wasn’t expected, that the sea water offshore from the reactors  had radioactivity more than 1,000 times the normal. This continues to rise; it’s  now up to 4,000 times.
A full two  weeks into the disaster Japan’s Prime Minister admitted that the situation was  still “grave and serious” and that we “can’t be optimistic”. But even this was a  face-saving understatement, as the water coming from reactor # 3 was soon to be  10,000 times as radioactive as permissible. The fuel in this reactor was what’s  called MOX fuel, which is a mixture of plutonium and uranium. Then we heard that  another 10,000 people were being relocated as the evacuation zone was enlarged  by 10 KM. The next day a government spokesman said things were still “very  unpredictable” as they’d found that water from reactor # 1 was also 10,000 times  more radioactive than allowable. 
Nearly three  weeks into the disaster Tepco clearly isn’t able to control what’s happening at  their crippled reactors.  Even more  radioactivity is getting outside reactor # 2 and it is near certain its  containment has been breached. Workers are reported fumbling around in the dark  trying to hook up electrical cables while standing in highly radioactive water,  with only plastic bags tied around their shoes; such is nuclear energy in the  trenches. In late March Tepco officials apologized for erroneously reporting  that water leaking from reactor # 2 was 10,000,000 times the norm. They  later reported the more correct figure was 100,000 times the radioactivity,  which remains a seriously dangerous level. The Washington Post just reported that this  amounts to 1,000 millisieverts (mSv) per hour, an exposure that would give a  worker a yearly dose in just 15 minutes, and will most certainly be  life-threatening to Tepco workers.
All of the  radioactive elements being spewed into the environment present health hazards to  present and future generations. It is interesting that most reporting has been  on the fairly short-lived Iodine 131. But what of radioactive Caesium 137, which  will contaminate farmland for 400 years; or the more long-lived carcinogens that  are most certainly being released, including Plutonium 239, which is toxic for  500,000 years? Plutonium is now contaminating the land and sea around Tepco’s  reactors.
BACK  TO SASKATCHEWAN
   Ignorance,  confusion and misinformation aren’t a sound way to deal with a catastrophic  nuclear accident. When you see the twisted buildings left from earlier  explosions and realize that there are no control rooms operating to reliably  monitor what’s actually happening in the reactors, you get more compassionate  for those making the face-saving statements and those sacrificing their health.  Trauma as well as radioactivity will take its toll on the Japanese. 
Prior to this  accident Japan was considering expanding its nuclear power “arsenal” so that its  nuclear-generated electricity would go from today’s 30% to 50% of the total by  2030. This won’t happen after Fukushima, and Cameco won’t be able to count on an  enlarged uranium market from this contaminated country.  Japan already has 55 nuclear plants  squeezed onto its small, earthquake prone island and there’s no safe place to  put its nuclear wastes. 
And this  brings us back to Saskatchewan, which is being targeted for a nuclear waste  dump. Cameco is on record as supporting taking nuclear wastes back from  countries that buy its uranium. Like Japan! When Saskatchewan’s Cigar Lake mine  flooded, co-owner Tepco provided pumping technology to help Cameco deal with the  problem. Well, their pumps have clearly now faced their Alamo. And what might  Cameco now do to help its corporate partner Tepco? What might be Cameco’s  quid-pro-quo? What about investing in  renewable energy and leaving the toxic uranium in the ground?
Jim Harding  is a retired professor of environmental and justice studies. Other writings on  sustainability, nuclear, renewable, etc. at: http://jimharding.brinkster.net
= =  = = = 
Additional  Uranium/Nuclear Related postings:


