By 2050, as much as $43 billion could be sapped from the Canadian economy because of natural disasters. Full story here.
Friday, April 18, 2014
Thursday, April 17, 2014
Free Trade: Pathway to Prosperity - or Back Road to Corporatism?
by Larry Powell
As globalization reaches a frenzied pace, free trade agreements (FTAs) between nations are coming thick and fast, too.
Now, a knowledgable source with impressive credentials is sounding the latest cautionary note about "CETA," the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement which Prime Minister Harper and the European Union signed, in principle last year.
Now, a knowledgable source with impressive credentials is sounding the latest cautionary note about "CETA," the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement which Prime Minister Harper and the European Union signed, in principle last year.
A Canadian expert in international law, Howard Mann, (above) is lending an important new voice to a now-familiar chorus of alarm about "CETA," in particular.
For decades, large corporations have been using provisions within existing free trade agreements to sue sovereign nations who pass certain laws protecting the environment and health of their citizens. The corporations view such laws as assaults on their own "rights" to do business and make a profit in those countries.
- For example, as long ago as the 1990s, an American company, Ethyl Corp. sued Canada under a clause in "NAFTA," the North American Free Trade Agreement. Canada had banned its fuel additive, MMT due to concerns that it was a poisonous neurotoxin. The ban stuck, but Canada had to pay the company (the same one which brought leaded gasoline to Canada back in the 20s), $17 million in compensation.
- Fast forward to today, and the stakes are much higher.
- The US-based pharmaceutical giant, Eli Lilly and Company is currently suing Canada, also under NAFTA, for $500 million. The move comes after Canadian courts struck down the company’s patents on two of its drugs. Those rulings removed Lilly's monopoly and allowed another company to replicate the medications, in a cheaper, generic form. (Ironically, the drugs in question, both antipsychotics, are suspected of causing a number of mental patients, both young and old, to take their own lives. However, those adverse reactions played little or no part in the court decisions.)
- Another, similar case has been launched by LonePine Resources, a Texas-based oil company. LonePine is suing Canada for $250 million because Quebec refused to allow it to "frack" beneath the St. Lawrence River, at least until better regulations could be put into place. "Fracking," or hydraulic fracturing, involves the controversial practise of pumping chemicals under pressure into underground shale formations, to force out the oil or gas. In documents filed under NAFTA, LonePine calls Quebec's actions, "an arbitrary, capricious, and illegal revocation of the Enterprise’s valuable right to mine for oil and gas..."
- Some three years ago, the global tobacco company, Philip Morris, sued the Australian government for passing a law requiring it to market its product in plain packages. The company claims the move breaches Australia’s bilateral investment treaty (FTA) with Hong Kong. Phillip Morris says it will seek billions of dollars in damages.
It wants $100 million dollars from the small nation for saying "no" to a company plan to build a "cyanide-leach" gold mine in one of its pristine rain forests. Costa Rica depends for much of its revenue, on tourists coming to enjoy the nation's natural beauty.
Some observers say the company will win its case.
And, in a recent column, British journalist George Monbiot writes, "In El Salvador, an Australian company is now suing the government before a closed tribunal of corporate lawyers for $300 million (nearly half the country's annual budget) in potential profits foregone. Why? Because El Salvador has refused permission for a gold mine that would poison people's drinking water."
Except for Ethyl Corp., none of these cases has been resolved yet.
When PinP asked the government official, Claude Rochon, to respond to the trade actions against Canada, he responded, "As always, the Government of Canada will vigorously defend interests of Canadian in this dispute settlement process. The Government of Canada is committed to transparency in NAFTA Chapter 11 disputes and posts public versions of documents on the Department's website."
So what does the future hold in a world where free trade agreements
are becoming "the new normal?"
are becoming "the new normal?"
Howard Mann testified before the Commons
Committee on International Trade that, “In my
opinion, the Investment Chapter (of CETA), if it continues on what appears to
be its present course, will provide foreign investors into Canada with the most
investor-friendly set of corporate rights ever drafted by the Canadian
government into a treaty."
After studying secret drafts which have leaked out, he declared, "This is a
Big Deal. A Very Big Deal!"
In an interview with PinP later, Mann suggests, we haven't seen anything yet, in terms of the number of lawsuits which Corporations will be launching against Canada once CETA becomes law.
PinP: “Is there a risk that CETA, once ratified, will lead to more lawsuits by investors against Canada?"
Mann: “No, there is a certainty! There have been over 600 such arbitrations commenced globally in the past 20 years, about half by EU-based companies. There is no reason to think they will not be equally aggressive using the mechanism against Canada. The creativity of industry in using the investor-state arbitration process to fend off any and every kind of government measure continues to amaze me, even after 18 years working in this field. From challenging anti-smoking measures, to protecting against side-effects of medications, fracking under the St. Lawrence River, protecting water basins in fragile environments, there is no area of decision-making that is outside the scope of these agreements.”
Mann further warns that CETA's provisions for increased investor rights, “Will weaken the ability of Canada’s elected lawmakers, both federal and provincial,
to legislate in major areas of public policy, including environment and health.”
Partisan Politics Enters the Fray
Mann is surprisingly candid over the lack of
“critical review” by the opposition Liberals over CETA.
“That the Liberal
party supports free trade and increased investments is fine. That they are
blind to the fact that the language used in such agreements can have multiple
effects, including on Canadian regulatory capacity to replace the environmental
laws the present government has dismantled, as they have promised they will, is
incomprehensible. Words matter, but it seems they prefer to support the notion
of free trade without any attention to the actual language in the actual text.
As a life-long Liberal, I find it stupefying.”
A Study in Contrasts
Just
how the governments of Canada and the U.K. are approaching such trade treaties
has become a study in contrast.
In the United Kingdom, MPs from all parties have called for a halt to talks on a very similar treaty with the U.S. Why? According to the newspaper, The Independent, they fear it may put “British sovereignty ‘at risk’ by surrendering judicial independence to multinational corporations.”
In
Canada, far from showing hesitation, there’s been nothing but unbridled
enthusiasm on the part of the federal government. Prime Minister Harper calls
the CETA, “The biggest deal Canada
has ever made.” In a letter to the editor, one of his western MPs, Robert Sopuck, writes, it will bring many jobs to his riding while raising the incomes of families there.
A
Government website boasts that Canada “currently has 25 foreign investment
promotion and protection agreements (FIPAs) in force around the world, with
hope of more to come. It further boasts that negotiations over the CETA have been
“the most transparent and inclusive in Canada’s history.”
But the reality, according to Mann, is quite different.
A redacted document on early CETA talks (l.), which leaked onto the internet.
“The EU-US investment negotiations have been put on hold in order to have a full-scale three month public consultation.
No such opportunity has ever been had in Canada on the CETA. We have to depend on leaks because our government will not issue an official draft.”
As significant as his warnings are, they're not the first. Groups such as the Council of Canadians and Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives have been saying similar things for years.
But, given Mann’s impressive credentials and experience, and, as all the cumulative evidence piles up, will Ottawa finally pay attention, or ignore it as its peril?
Grain, Trains and Autocrats: Farmers Pay the Price for Dismantling Wheat Board
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
There is a direct correlation between the loss of the farmer-elected Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) and the current rail transportation boondoggle. Details here.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Strong Support Shown for Bees! More Needed!
Wow! In just a week, enough of us chipped in to fund the world's first people-powered study on what's killing our bees. Let's build on this and create a massive global offensive to take on the chemical companies -- pledge below:
Dear friends, Right now, billions of bees are dying. Already, there are nowhere near enough honeybees in Europe to pollinate the crops, and in California -- the biggest food producer in the US -- beekeepers are losing 40% of their bees each year.
We're in the middle of an environmental holocaust that threatens all of us, because without pollination by bees, most plants and ⅓ of our food supply are gone.
Scientists are sounding the alarm about pesticides that are toxic to bees, and say we’re using way, way more pesticides on our crops than we need. But as with oil companies and climate change, big drug companies that sell pesticides are fighting back with corporate-funded junk science that questions the evidence, and gives politicians an excuse to delay.
Manitoba’s First Glyphosate-Resistant Weed Confirmed
Manitoba Co-Operator
The good news is, the weed was found at only two sites out of 283 surveyed last fall. Details here.
Artist; Paul Hoppe
Artist; Paul Hoppe
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Canadians Turn Up The Heat Against The Northern Gateway Tar Sands Pipeline
Climate Progress
Residents of Kitimat, B.C. — the last stop of the proposed pipeline’s route —voted no to the pipeline’s construction…Full story here.
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Rex Does it Again!
In the wake of the latest, earth-shattering reports from the IPCC about the grave implications of climate change and the need for drastic and immediate, remedial action to prevent further disaster, (see 2 recent blogposts, below) Rex Murphy chooses the passing of Canada's previous Finance Minister as the topic for today's "Cross-Country Checkup" on CBC Radio. As if that topic, as sad, tragic and newsworthy as it was, had not been exhaustively covered already.
As many of us will know by now, Rex gets paid to speak to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), to tell them what they want to hear.
If Rex's climate-denying bias is the reason behind this blatant oversight, perhaps it is time for him to step down and make way for someone more objective and capable of better news judgement.
As many of us will know by now, Rex gets paid to speak to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), to tell them what they want to hear.
If Rex's climate-denying bias is the reason behind this blatant oversight, perhaps it is time for him to step down and make way for someone more objective and capable of better news judgement.
PLT
Climate Panel Stunner: Avoiding Climate Catastrophe Is Super Cheap — But Only If We Act Now
Climate Progress
Sunset over Manitoba. PLT photo.
The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just issued its third of four planned reports. This one is on “mitigation” — “human intervention to reduce the sources or enhance the sinks of greenhouse gases.” Details here.
Saturday, April 12, 2014
A Prayer for Earth Day
Logging our dwindling forests. PLT photo.
Forgive us, oh Lord, for the profound harm we mortals are inflicting on Thy sacred creation, Mother Earth. Our reckless burning of fossil fuels is contributing to catastrophic climate change which, as we speak, is attacking many parts of Thy planet, upon which Thou hast so graciously permitted us to dwell. Bestow upon us all, oh Lord, the eco-wisdom we will need to radically change our behaviour, so that we no longer threaten just our own kind, but the lowly wild creatures with which we also share the humble home you have so graciously provided for us all. Help us to avert and lessen the dangers we have so thoughtlessly created, which now threaten the very safety, security and survival of future human generations - our children and our grandchildren.
Forgive us, oh Lord, for we know not what we do.
In Jesus name. Amen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
PLEASE READ LARRY'S BOOK - THE MERCHANTS OF MENACE.
Read Larry's book here.
-
Are hungry kids a priority for the Harper government? by Larry Powell The forum (for the riding of Dauphin - Swan River - Neepawa) w...
-
by Larry Powell Planet In Peril has sorted through some of the confusion surrounding the absence of Robert Sopuck, the Conservative M...
-
Larry Powell Powell is a veteran, award-winning journalist based in Shoal Lake, Manitoba, Canada. He specialize in stories about agriculture...